Resolved

development plan review

Review of proposed site and building changes for new or revised development.

Whether the approved plans match any conditions attached to the earlier zoning variance for this parcel.

Typically discussed at Hamilton Property Community Visioning Process Phase 2. Check back when the next agenda is published.

The Plan Commission voted 7-0 to approve the site and building plans for three self-storage buildings on Columbus Street. Staff said the project meets zoning rules and didn’t flag landscaping or lighting issues. The vote was framed as a design-and-compliance step after a zoning variance granted earlier this year.

  1. passed 7-0 Plan Commission · May 11, 2026

    Review of Site and Architectural Plan for the construction self-storage units, located at Columbus Street, Parcel No. 202-201-010-9, in Industrial District I-2, submitted by Brian Backler.

    Motion made to approve the plans.

    Pat Klein Yes
    Kyle Kordell Yes
    Rick Inman Yes
    Tracey Koach Yes
    Kristin Lee Yes
    Matt Heckenlaible Yes
    Adam Wachowski Yes
  2. passed Business and Industrial Development Committee - Community Development Authority · Jan 27, 2026

    Discussion of proposed site plan for former West Eggers development site

    Motion made to reject the latest proposal

  1. The Hamilton property visioning group reviewed site design concepts, focusing on layout tradeoffs such as traffic flow, buffers, access points, and what the site could look like if built.

    Hamilton Property Community Visioning Process Phase 4
  2. The Hamilton property visioning group reviewed design concepts for the site, continuing discussion of layout tradeoffs such as traffic flow, buffers, access points, and what the site could look and feel like if built.

    Hamilton Property Community Visioning Process Phase 4
  3. The Plan Commission approved the site and architectural plans for three separate self-storage buildings on Columbus Street (Parcel No. 202-201-010-9) in the I-2 Industrial District, submitted by Brian Backler.

    Plan Commission
  4. Staff stated the self-storage project met zoning rules and raised no issues with landscaping or lighting; the commission approved the plans without changes.

    Plan Commission
  5. The plan review was described as a follow-through step after a zoning variance issued in January 2026, with the May action focused on design and compliance rather than whether self-storage is allowed.

    Plan Commission