Active

ordinance variance appeals

Requests for exceptions to local rules when strict compliance is impractical.

What to Watch
Watch for any follow-up appeal steps outside the council process and whether Chapter 9-9 waiver standards get clarified in future cases.
Coming Up

Typically discussed at City Council. Check back when the next agenda is published.

The Story

On Dec. 15, the City Council voted 9-0 to deny a request to waive the city’s sex-offender residency restrictions under Chapter 9-9. The council’s reasons included the nature of the offense, no qualifying exemption or prior residency tie, inaccuracies in the request, and that the applicant bought a home knowing the rule.

Key Decisions
  1. passed 9-0 City Council · Dec 15, 2025

    25-251 Consider Appeal for a Variance from the City Residency Restrictions Applicable to Sex Offenders, Per Chapter 9-9 of City Ordinances

    Motion to deny the appeal, consistent with the recommendation of the Chief of Police

    Mark Bittner Yes
    Doug Brandt Yes
    Shannon Derby Yes
    Bill LeClair Yes
    Darla LeClair Yes
    Tim Petri Yes
    Bonnie Shimulunas Yes
    Scott Stechmesser Yes
    Adam Wachowski Yes
Record

  1. City Council voted 9-0 to deny a request to waive the city’s sex-offender residency restrictions under Chapter 9-9.

    City Council

  2. Reasons stated for denial included: the nature of the offense; no qualifying exemption or prior residency tie to the city; inaccuracies in the waiver request; and that the applicant purchased a residence despite being aware of the ordinance restrictions.

    City Council

  3. Council treated the request as an enforcement decision rather than a hardship exception.

    City Council
← All topics